[SCore-users-jp] Re: [SCore-users] (no subject)

2002年 7月 29日 (月) 18:29:08 JST

From: neural_shock ＠ e-mail.ru
Subject: Re: [SCore-users] (no subject)
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:04:18 +0400
Message-ID: <3d450512.44db.0 ＠ e-mail.ru>

neural_shock> >neural_shock> >neural_shock> hello.
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >neural_shock> 
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >neural_shock> 1. yes it works fine.
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >neural_shock> 2. i did not run lu class w. there are too few
neural_shock> memory on my test
neural_shock> >neural_shock> machines even
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >neural_shock> for class b of this programm ( as far as i think.
neural_shock> SCore's FEP
neural_shock> >neural_shock> does not print
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >neural_shock> "memory could be exhausted" but nodes begins swap
neural_shock> pages too heavy
neural_shock> >neural_shock> when i run
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >neural_shock> lu.B.2 ).
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >neural_shock> 
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >neural_shock> with respect, mike. 
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >Are these true?
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >Class W is smaller than Class A.
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >Class S < W < A < B
neural_shock> >neural_shock> >
neural_shock> >neural_shock> 
neural_shock> >neural_shock> 嫖s. you are right i was wrong. and i have tested it already. results are the
neural_shock> >neural_shock> same.
neural_shock> >
neural_shock> >So, how about class S?
neural_shock> >
neural_shock> >Shinji.
neural_shock> >------
neural_shock> >Shinji Sumimoto, Fujitsu Labs
neural_shock> 
neural_shock> S is too small. there are no rpoblems. but as i think it is simply because checkpointing is already done when system shuts down scored.

Sorry. 

How many memory do your nodes have?
Maybe 10MB free memory is needed for lu.W.2.

In my environment, lu.A.2 and lu.W.2 works fine.

====================================================
[s-sumi bin]$ scrun -nodes=2,checkpoint=5s,scored=server  ./lu.A.2  
SCore-D 5.0.0 connected (jid=2).
<0:0> SCORE: 2 nodes (2x1) ready.

 NAS Parallel Benchmarks 2.2 -- LU Benchmark

 Size:  64x 64x 64
 Iterations: 250
 Number of processes:     2

 Time step    1

SCORE: Checkpointing ... done.

SCORE: Checkpointing ... done.
 Time step   20

SCORE: Checkpointing ... FEP:WARNING SCore-D unexpectedly terminated.
FEP: [29/Jul/2002 18:31:19] Waiting for SCore-D restarted ...
FEP: [29/Jul/2002 18:31:24] SCore-D restarted.
SCore-D 5.0.0 connected (jid=2).
SCORE: Execution restarted from checkpoint.
 Time step   20

SCORE: Checkpointing ... done.

====================================================

Shinji.
------
Shinji Sumimoto, Fujitsu Labs
_______________________________________________
SCore-users mailing list
SCore-users ＠ pccluster.org
http://www.pccluster.org/mailman/listinfo/score-users