[SCore-users-jp] Re: [SCore-users] Something strange in PM/Ethernet Network Trunking

Shinji Sumimoto s-sumi @ flab.fujitsu.co.jp
2004年 5月 7日 (金) 18:40:47 JST


Hi.

From: Chen Hao <hchen @ mdl.ipc.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [SCore-users] Something strange in PM/Ethernet Network Trunking
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 17:31:15 +0800
Message-ID: <409B5763.8090705 @ mdl.ipc.pku.edu.cn>

hchen> I didn't change the values maxnsend and backoff options in 
hchen> pm-ethernet.conf(maxnsend=16, backoff=4800). And as I posted early, 
hchen> pingpong and pingping's results had great different, It seemed very strange.

Could you change the value maxnsend=24, backoff=2400, and test?  

The PingPing is a burst test, so communicaiton performance is
decreased if some re-transmission has occurred.

If the situation does not change, please test PM level communication
bandwidth using rpmtest.

http://www.pccluster.org/score/dist/score/html/en/installation/pm-testethernet.html

Shinji.

hchen> Shinji Sumimoto wrote:
hchen> 
hchen> >Hi.
hchen> >
hchen> >Sorry for late response because of holidays in Japan.
hchen> >
hchen> >Have you changed the values maxnsend and backoff options in
hchen> >pm-ethernet.conf?  If so, how about pmtest communication performace?
hchen> >
hchen> >Shinji.
hchen> >
hchen> >From: Chen Hao <hchen @ mdl.ipc.pku.edu.cn>
hchen> >Subject: [SCore-users] Something strange in PM/Ethernet Network Trunking
hchen> >Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:50:12 +0800
hchen> >Message-ID: <408FA884.2020508 @ mdl.ipc.pku.edu.cn>
hchen> >
hchen> >hchen> Hello all, I used PMB 2.2.1 to measure SCORE/MPI performance and found 
hchen> >hchen> something string. When I used two 3C905B NICs, I got the results of 
hchen> >hchen> PingPong and Pingping as following:
hchen> >hchen> #---------------------------------------------------
hchen> >hchen> # Benchmarking PingPong
hchen> >hchen> # ( #processes = 2 )
hchen> >hchen> # ( 14 additional processes waiting in MPI_Barrier)
hchen> >hchen> #---------------------------------------------------
hchen> >hchen>        #bytes #repetitions      t[usec]   Mbytes/sec
hchen> >hchen>             0         1000        49.13         0.00
hchen> >hchen>             1         1000        49.89         0.02
hchen> >hchen>             2         1000        50.40         0.04
hchen> >hchen>             4         1000        50.54         0.08
hchen> >hchen>             8         1000        50.86         0.15
hchen> >hchen>            16         1000        52.92         0.29
hchen> >hchen>            32         1000        56.37         0.54
hchen> >hchen>            64         1000        62.83         0.97
hchen> >hchen>           128         1000        75.88         1.61
hchen> >hchen>           256         1000        98.53         2.48
hchen> >hchen>           512         1000       151.50         3.22
hchen> >hchen>          1024         1000       247.95         3.94
hchen> >hchen>          2048         1000       347.78         5.62
hchen> >hchen>          4096         1000       463.81         8.42
hchen> >hchen>          8192         1000       594.80        13.13
hchen> >hchen>         16384         1000      1056.45        14.79
hchen> >hchen>         32768         1000      1754.30        17.81
hchen> >hchen>         65536          640      3122.35        20.02
hchen> >hchen>        131072          320      5992.52        20.86
hchen> >hchen>        262144          160     11469.87        21.80
hchen> >hchen>        524288           80     22598.54        22.13
hchen> >hchen>       1048576           40     44952.29        22.25
hchen> >hchen>       2097152           20     89360.53        22.38
hchen> >hchen>       4194304           10    178679.39        22.39
hchen> >hchen> #---------------------------------------------------
hchen> >hchen> # Benchmarking PingPing
hchen> >hchen> # ( #processes = 2 )
hchen> >hchen> # ( 14 additional processes waiting in MPI_Barrier)
hchen> >hchen> #---------------------------------------------------
hchen> >hchen>        #bytes #repetitions      t[usec]   Mbytes/sec
hchen> >hchen>             0         1000        55.40         0.00
hchen> >hchen>             1         1000        54.75         0.02
hchen> >hchen>             2         1000        52.09         0.04
hchen> >hchen>             4         1000        55.12         0.07
hchen> >hchen>             8         1000        53.07         0.14
hchen> >hchen>            16         1000        58.13         0.26
hchen> >hchen>            32         1000        57.33         0.53
hchen> >hchen>            64         1000        67.17         0.91
hchen> >hchen>           128         1000        79.80         1.53
hchen> >hchen>           256         1000        98.88         2.47
hchen> >hchen>           512         1000       164.32         2.97
hchen> >hchen>          1024         1000       252.47         3.87
hchen> >hchen>          2048         1000      1901.03         1.03
hchen> >hchen>          4096         1000      3520.96         1.11
hchen> >hchen>          8192         1000      2870.28         2.72
hchen> >hchen>         16384         1000     10062.60         1.55
hchen> >hchen>         32768         1000     10718.80         2.92
hchen> >hchen>         65536          640     20858.36         3.00
hchen> >hchen>        131072          320     26830.07         4.66
hchen> >hchen>        262144          160     39868.81         6.27
hchen> >hchen>        524288           80     62836.03         7.96
hchen> >hchen>       1048576           40    108759.45         9.19
hchen> >hchen>       2097152           20    194836.70        10.27
hchen> >hchen>       4194304           10    379412.10        10.54
hchen> >hchen> we could see that pingpong's bandwidth is very poor when packet is from 
hchen> >hchen> 2KB to 64KB, what's the matter?
hchen> >hchen> 
hchen> >hchen> ChenHao
hchen> >hchen> _______________________________________________
hchen> >hchen> SCore-users mailing list
hchen> >hchen> SCore-users @ pccluster.org
hchen> >hchen> http://www.pccluster.org/mailman/listinfo/score-users
hchen> >hchen> 
hchen> >hchen> 
hchen> >------
hchen> >Shinji Sumimoto, Fujitsu Labs
hchen> >_______________________________________________
hchen> >SCore-users mailing list
hchen> >SCore-users @ pccluster.org
hchen> >http://www.pccluster.org/mailman/listinfo/score-users
hchen> >
hchen> >  
hchen> >
hchen> 
hchen> 
------
Shinji Sumimoto, Fujitsu Labs
_______________________________________________
SCore-users mailing list
SCore-users @ pccluster.org
http://www.pccluster.org/mailman/listinfo/score-users



SCore-users-jp メーリングリストの案内