[SCore-users-jp] Re: [SCore-users] (no subject)

[neural_shock ＠ e-mail.ru]

>Hi.
>
>Sorry for late response.
>
>From: neural_shock ＠ e-mail.ru
>Subject: [SCore-users] (no subject)
>Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 11:18:39 +0400
>Message-ID: <3d3e54cf.7f1.0 ＠ e-mail.ru>
>
>neural_shock> hello.
>neural_shock> 
>neural_shock> here are some logs of checpointing failure in english. see messages
on Jul 24
>neural_shock> in "messages" file in attached tar ball. there are also "gdbout2"
file, there
>neural_shock> are some debug information from kgdb. 
>neural_shock> 
>neural_shock> with respect, mike.
>
>Could you give us more information.
>
>1) Is the program (LU class A) working fine without check pointing?
>
>2)  How about class W of LU.
>
>Shinji.
>-----
>Shinji Sumimoto
hello.

1. yes it works fine.
2. i did not run lu class w. there are too few memory on my test machines even
for class b of this programm ( as far as i think. SCore's FEP does not print
"memory could be exhausted" but nodes begins swap pages too heavy when i run
lu.B.2 ).

with respect, mike. 

http://www.e-mail.ru

---

---
http://www.E-mail.ru  - ���������� ���������� �������� ������.
����� 100 ��/�, SMTP/POP3, SMS, ������������, ������ �� ����� � �������, �������������, ��������, ��������, ����� � ������ ������.
_______________________________________________
SCore-users mailing list
SCore-users ＠ pccluster.org
http://www.pccluster.org/mailman/listinfo/score-users